Intersectoral cooperation between university hospitals and physicians in private practice in Germany- where the potential for optimization lies.

BACKGROUND: Intersectoral cooperation between physicians in private practice and hospitals is highly relevant for ensuring the quality of medical care. However, the experiences and potential for optimization at this interface from the perspective of physicians in private practice have not yet been systematically investigated. The aim of this questionnaire survey was to record participants' experiences with regard to cooperation with university hospitals and to identify the potential for optimizing intersectoral cooperation. METHODS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study using an online survey among practising physicians of all disciplines offering ambulatory care in Germany. The link to a 41-item questionnaire was sent via mail using a commercial mail distributor in which 1095 practising physicians participated. Baseline statistics were performed with SurveyMonkey and Excel. RESULTS: A total of 70.6%/722 of the responding physicians in private practice rated cooperation with university hospitals as satisfactory. Satisfaction with the quality of treatment was confirmed by 87.2%/956 of the physicians. The subjectively perceived complication rate in patient care was assessed as rare (80.9%/886). However, the median waiting time for patients in the inpatient discharge letter was 4 weeks. The accessibility of medical contact persons was rated as rather difficult by 52.6%/577 of the physicians. A total of 48.6%/629 of the participants considered better communication as an equal partner to be an important potential for optimization. Likewise, 65.2%/714 participants wished for closer cooperation in pre- and/or post inpatient care. CONCLUSION: The following optimization potentials were identified: timely discharge letters, clear online presentations of clinical contacts, improved accessibility by telephone, introduction or further development of a referral portal, regular intersectoral training and/or "get-togethers", regular surveys of general practitioners and implementation of resulting measures, further development of cross-sectoral communication channels and strengthening of hospital IT.

Initial deterrent effects of the crackdown on drinking drivers in the state of Arizona.

This paper reports the initial impact on motor vehicle crashes and casualties resulting from recent efforts to crackdown on drinking drivers in Arizona. Like similar efforts throughout the United States, Arizona lawmakers adopted tough, deterrence-based legislation as the state's chief response to heightened concern with the problem of alcohol-impaired driving. The impact of the new law was measured using interrupted time-series analysis of traffic data. The results indicated that the legal intervention had no deterrent effect. An examination of possible competing events suggested that significant deterrence of drinking and driving was achieved prior to introduction of the new law. Initiation of this effect was attributed to preexisting anti-drunk-driving publicity.